Plan of Structure Fig D: In the primary concrete frames, there will be hairline cracking. Log In Sign Up. Modeling of the structure — 5 storey Fig F. And also compared the base force and displacement of RC bare frame structure with 5, 10, 15 stories.
|Date Added:||11 February 2018|
|File Size:||64.39 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Description of frame structure The RC frame structure 5, 10, 15 stories is considered in this study. Modeling of the structure — 5 storey Fig F.
In the primary concrete frames, there will etabs 9.7.1 extensive damage in the beams. Formation of Plastic hinges at step 10 www. Static approximation used in the pushover analysis.
The program includes several built-indefault ehabs properties that are based onaverage values from ATC for etabs 9.7.1 and average values from FEMA for steel members. The details of beams and columns are shown in table 1. All slabs were assumed as Membrane element of mm thickness. Modeling of the structure — 5, 10 and 15 storey Fig I.
As at performance point, hinges were in LS-CP range, overall performance of building is said to be Life safety to Collapse prevention level. Remember me on this computer.
ETABS Version: 9.7.1 Download
Etabs 9.7.1 weight supported in between the storey shall be distributed to the floors above and below in inverse proportion to its distance from the floors. Pushover curve and capacity spectrum curve of 10 storey frame structure Table 3. Conclusions The performance of reinforced concrete frame was investigated using pushover analysis. These are the conclusions drawn from the analysis: D 1 1 Assistant professor, Dept. In Pushover analysis structure is subjected to monotonically increasing lateral load until the peak etabs 9.7.1 of the structure is obtained as shown in figure Fig A.
The pushover analysis is etab method to observe the successive damage state of the building. B, Non-Linear static analysis of multi-storied building, International journal of engineering trends and etabs 9.7.1 ILETT — volume 4 issue oct And also compared the base force and displacement of RC bare frame structure with 5, 10, 15 9.1. Graph shows the curve Force Vs Deformation www. Comparison of maximum base force stabs 5, 10, 15 storey Table 6.
Etabs – Download | Civil Engineering Blog
Formation of Plastic hinges at step 12 V1. Comparison of maximum displacement of 5, 10, 15 storey VII. Pushover curve and capacity spectrum curve etabs 9.7.1 5 storey frame structure www. References  Srinivasu A and Dr.
Performance levels and ranges 2. Pushover curve and capacity spectrum curve of 15 storey frame structure Table4. Data To Be Used 1. It has been observed that, on subsequent push to building, hinges started forming in beams first.
Pushover analysis is a non linear static analysis used to determine the force-displacement relationship, or capacity curve, etqbs a structural element. The performance etabs 9.7.1 are as follows: Modeling of the structure — 10 storey www. The fundamental natural time period Ta calculates from the expression 0. Enter the email address you signed up with and etabs 9.7.1 email you a reset link.
The seismic weight of each floor is its full dead load plus appropriate amount of imposed load.